42 Filed, 38 Remaining: Inside Brazil’s MP 1.394 Amendments

Congress extended MP 1.394 amendment filings to October 13, with 42 submitted and four withdrawn as of October 4.

8 min read

Brazil’s Congress has extended the deadline for amendments to MP 1.394 to October 13 at 23:59. As of October 4, the register listed 42 submissions and four withdrawals, leaving 38 not marked withdrawn; the extension itself does not postpone enforcement of the betting ban.

Editorial illustration of Brazil's National Congress in Brasília with its twin towers, Senate dome and Chamber bowl.
AI-generated editorial illustration based on a photograph by Marcos Oliveira/Agência Senado.

KEY FACTS AT A GLANCE

  • Amendment deadline: October 13, 2026, at 23:59.
  • Legal status: Filed amendments remain proposals.
  • Record checked: October 4, 2026.

What the October 13 amendment deadline changes

The October 1 order extended the period for lawmakers to submit amendments to MP 1.394/2026. Congress can receive filings until the new deadline; approval requires further parliamentary action.

The MP took effect on publication, prohibiting fixed-odds betting on real sporting events and virtual games. Government guidance sets October 5 at 23:59 as the end of voluntary withdrawals and October 6 as the date sites and apps become unavailable. Advertising and sponsorship removal is scheduled for October 5. The October 6 shutdown explainer covers those operational deadlines.

Congress’s calendar runs alongside that timetable. November 9 marks the start of urgency processing if the MP remains unresolved. November 23 ends the initial 60-day period. If voting is not concluded in both houses, that period is automatically extended by another 60 days.

Congress and enforcement follow separate timetables
2026 milestones. The amendment extension changes the filing window; it does not itself postpone enforcement.
September 25
Shared starting point
MP 1.394 is published and takes effect.
September 30
Congress
Joint committee designated.
October 1
Congress
Amendment deadline extension recorded.
October 5
Enforcement · scheduled
Advertising and sponsorship removal deadline.
October 523:59
Enforcement · scheduled
Voluntary withdrawal window closes.
October 6
Enforcement · scheduled
Betting sites and apps are scheduled to become unavailable.
October 1323:59
Congress · filing deadline
Amendment submissions close.
From October 14
Enforcement · government timetable
Caixa receives balances that banks cannot return. This is a conditional step, not a universal transfer date.
October 25Calculated
Enforcement · original Article 4 rule
30-day authorization-expiry rule. October 25 is calculated from September 25 publication, not a confirmed implementation date.
November 9
Congress · scheduled
Urgency regime begins if consideration remains unresolved.
November 23
Congress · scheduled
Initial 60-day period ends. If voting is not concluded in both houses, the period automatically extends by another 60 days.
Dates and times are shown as published in Brazil, without time-zone conversion. Future milestones reflect the timetable reviewed on October 4.
dyutam.com

Why 42 filed leaves 38 remaining

The official register retains submissions after withdrawal. Amendment 12 was withdrawn on October 1, followed by amendments 18, 19 and 20 on October 2. Subtracting those four from the 42 recorded submissions leaves 38 not marked withdrawn in the October 4 check.

“Remaining” describes filings not marked withdrawn, rather than approved changes. Pedro Aihara’s amendment 14 supersedes his withdrawn amendment 12.

What lawmakers want to change

The filings offer different answers to the same question: how much of the previously licensed market should survive? Marcos Braz’s amendment 10 would retain authorized betting on final results and collective metrics while prohibiting slots, online casinos and bets on individual sporting actions, including cards, corners and fouls.

Aihara’s amendment 14 draws a different boundary. It would preserve sports betting and other online games that do not use slot or equivalent mechanics, while retaining restrictions on online-game advertising.

Astronauta Marcos Pontes’s amendment 15 takes a sports-only approach and addresses licensing directly. It proposes restoring federal authorizations without a new application or fee, subject to continued regulatory compliance, and adding the period from September 25 to publication of the conversion law to their terms. A conversion law is the resulting legislation that replaces the provisional measure.

What selected amendments would change
Eight examples from MP 1.394’s amendment register. These are distinct proposals, not adopted changes; status reviewed October 4, 2026.
No. 10Marcos BrazNot withdrawn
Current MP
Prohibits fixed-odds betting on sports and online games.
Proposed change
Allow authorized betting on final results and collective or team metrics. Ban slots, online casinos and bets on individual sporting actions, such as cards, corners and fouls.
No. 14Pedro AiharaNot withdrawnReplaces withdrawn No. 12
Current MP
Prohibits fixed-odds betting on sports and online games.
Proposed change
Limit the operating ban to slots and equivalent mechanics. Preserve sports betting and other non-slot online games, while retaining restrictions on online-game advertising.
No. 15Astronauta Marcos PontesNot withdrawn
Current MP
Extinguishes existing betting authorizations 30 days after publication.
Proposed change
Restore compliant federal licenses for sports betting only, without a new fee or application; add the period from September 25 to publication of the conversion law to their term. States and the Federal District could also restore sports licenses.
No. 11Marcos BrazNot withdrawn
Current MP
Bans betting advertising and sponsorship, with a 10-day removal period.
Proposed change
Permit passive branding on uniforms and arenas under existing contracts with authorized operators until season-end “and/or” up to 24 months from publication of the proposed conversion law.
No. 1Beto PretoNot withdrawn
Current MP
R$200,000 daily fine for breaching Article 8’s refund-related liquidity and reporting duties.
Proposed change
Raise that daily fine to R$500,000.
No. 2Beto PretoNot withdrawn
Current MP
Refund route through Caixa; no such deadline in Article 9.
Proposed change
After 180 days from transfer to Caixa, direct unclaimed funds to the National Health Fund (FNS).
No. 42Alessandro VieiraNot withdrawn
Current MP
Refund route through Caixa; no such deadline in Article 9.
Proposed change
After five years from transfer to Caixa, direct unclaimed funds to the National Public Security Fund (FNSP), alongside specified fines and confiscations.
No. 18Jorge KajuruWithdrawn October 2Historical comparison only
Current MP
Article 4 rules out repayment of authorization fees.
Withdrawn proposal
Refund the unused portion of the five-year authorization fee pro rata, adjusted by the Selic rate.
Selection, not a classification of all 42 filings. Proposals can conflict with one another. “Not withdrawn” does not mean approved.
dyutam.com

Sponsorship and unclaimed balances take separate paths

Braz’s amendment 11 would permit passive brand display on uniforms and arenas under existing contracts with authorized operators. Its wording refers to the end of the sporting season and/or a maximum of 24 months from publication of the proposed conversion law. That conditional language does not give every club an automatic two-year exemption today.

The fund proposals use different clocks: 180 days for Beto Preto’s amendment 2 and five years for Alessandro Vieira’s amendment 42. Each runs from the actual transfer to Caixa, rather than a universal October 14 start. They would direct unclaimed balances to the National Health Fund and National Public Security Fund respectively.

Jorge Kajuru withdrew amendment 18 on October 2. It had sought proportional repayment of unused authorization fees, adjusted by the Selic rate.

Amendment 4 targets broadcast prize promotions

Beto Preto’s amendment 4 would repeal Articles 1-A, 1-B and 7 of Law 5.768/1971. Existing broadcast prize-promotion authorizations under Articles 1-A and 1-B would run to their original expiry without renewal. That transition does not extend fixed-odds betting licenses.

What happens next in Congress

The joint committee was designated on September 30, but its official page still showed it awaiting installation, with the presidency vacant, on October 4. The normal route is committee consideration followed by votes in the Chamber of Deputies and Senate.

A committee report would identify which proposals are recommended to advance. Filings and withdrawals can still change before the October 13 deadline.

The wider policy dispute also includes the illegal betting market crackdown and the AGU lawsuit seeking damages for the public health system.

FAQs

What is the October 13 deadline for MP 1.394?

It is the deadline for lawmakers to submit amendments, ending at 23:59 on October 13, 2026. It is not a deadline for Congress to approve the measure.

Does the extension postpone Brazil’s betting shutdown?

The extension itself does not postpone enforcement. Government guidance schedules the end of voluntary withdrawals for October 5 at 23:59 and site and app unavailability from October 6.

Are there 42 amendments or 38?

Congress recorded 42 submissions. Four were withdrawn, leaving 38 not marked withdrawn as of October 4. The register includes withdrawn filings, so both numbers describe different counts.

Have the amendments restored sports betting?

A submitted amendment does not restore sports betting. The filings are proposals for congressional consideration, and their appearance in the register does not make their provisions law.

Would every proposal preserve only sports betting?

No. Pedro Aihara’s amendment 14 would preserve sports betting and other non-slot online games, while restricting slot or equivalent mechanics and retaining online-game advertising restrictions.

Would clubs automatically get two more years of betting sponsorship?

No. Amendment 11 proposes a conditional transition for passive branding on uniforms and arenas under existing contracts with authorized operators, referring to season-end and/or up to 24 months from publication of the proposed conversion law.

Is Jorge Kajuru’s authorization-fee refund amendment still pending?

Amendment 18 was withdrawn on October 2. Its proportional refund proposal remains visible in the historical register as a withdrawn filing.

KEY TAKEAWAYS

  • Different market proposals — amendment 14 preserves sports and other non-slot games; amendment 15 restores sports betting only.
  • Separate authorizations — amendment 4’s transition covers broadcast prize promotions.
  • Withdrawn fee-refund proposal — Kajuru withdrew amendment 18 on October 2.

Sources

Share
Written by

Aevan Lark

Aevan Lark is a gambling industry veteran with over 7 years of experience working behind the scenes at leading crypto casinos — from VIP management to risk analysis and customer operations. His insider perspective spans online gambling, sports betting, provably fair gaming, and prediction markets. On Dyutam, Aevan creates in-depth guides, builds verification tools, and delivers honest, data-driven reviews to help players understand the odds, verify fairness, and gamble responsibly.

Leave a response

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked with an asterisk.