Ohio Sends Cease-and-Desist Letters to 10 Prediction Market Firms
Ohio demands an immediate stop to sports contracts from ten prediction market firms, with written compliance confirmation due October 16.
Ohio has sent cease-and-desist letters to ten prediction market firms, demanding an immediate stop to offering or facilitating sports event contracts to people located in the state, according to the Ohio Casino Control Commission’s October 2 notices. The letters require written confirmation of compliance by October 16, 2026; that date is a response deadline, not a two-week window to continue operating.

KEY FACTS AT A GLANCE
- Action: The Ohio Casino Control Commission issued ten letters dated October 2, 2026, covering exchanges and firms that facilitate sports contracts.
- Timing: The notices demand immediate cessation and written confirmation within 14 days, by October 16.
- Scope: Sports event contracts offered or facilitated to people located in Ohio.
- Robinhood: Its letter reasserts a March 31, 2025 notice.
Which ten firms received Ohio’s notices?
The commission’s packet covers Coinbase, Gemini, Moomoo, Novig, Plus500, Polymarket, Prophet X, Robinhood, Underdog and Webull. Those consumer-facing names do not always match the legal recipients. The Novig and Underdog notices each address two entities. The Polymarket letter is addressed to PM US Tech (QC Tech LLC).
| Brand | Named recipient(s) | Notice context |
|---|---|---|
| Coinbase | Coinbase, Inc. | October 2 notice |
| Gemini | Gemini Titan, LLC | October 2 notice |
| Moomoo | Moomoo Financial Inc. | October 2 notice |
| Novig | Novig Betting, Inc.Ludlow Exchange, LLC | October 2 notice |
| Plus500 | Plus500US Financial Services, LLC | October 2 notice |
| Polymarket | PM US Tech (QC Tech LLC) | October 2 notice |
| Prophet X | Prophet X | October 2 notice |
| Robinhood | Robinhood Derivatives, LLC | Reaffirms March 31, 2025 notice |
| Underdog | UDM, LLC d/b/a Underdog PredictUnderdog Exchange DCM, Inc. | October 2 notice |
| Webull | Webull Financial LLC | October 2 notice |
The mix matters because the action reaches beyond exchanges that list contracts. It also targets firms that provide customer access or facilitate transactions, showing that the demand covers exchanges and the businesses connecting users with them.
What the cease-and-desist letters require
The commission treats the sports contracts described in its letters as sports gaming requiring an Ohio license. It alleges that the recipients are offering or facilitating that activity without the required authorization. Ohio Revised Code Section 3775.03 provides the state licensing requirement; the letters are enforcement demands, not criminal convictions.
The operative instruction is to “immediately cease and desist.” The letters cover offering, participating in offering, or facilitating those who offer sports event contracts, including soliciting or accepting orders from people in Ohio for contracts listed on exchanges known as designated contract markets. They also cover operating such an exchange or a futures commission merchant, an intermediary handling customer orders, that offers those contracts to people located in Ohio.
A separate instruction requires written confirmation within 14 days of the October 2 letters. That makes October 16 the compliance-confirmation deadline.
All ten letters warn that failure to comply may lead to administrative, civil, nuisance or criminal action. Nine also describe a possible civil penalty or fine, including an amount equal to the money or the value of property the commission alleges was unlawfully obtained or retained through Ohio sports event contracts. Robinhood’s renewed notice does not repeat that financial-penalty provision. These are threatened remedies; the packet does not announce that any penalty has been imposed.
Robinhood’s notice renews an earlier demand
Robinhood Derivatives, LLC received a different form of letter. The commission reasserted its March 31, 2025 cease-and-desist notice and said enforcement had been held pending court proceedings. Its October 2 letter renews the demand for immediate compliance after the Sixth Circuit’s latest ruling.
Kalshi and Crypto.com, which received Ohio’s March 2025 notices alongside Robinhood, are not recipients of the October 2 letters. That absence should not be read as an exemption, a new license or confirmation that either company’s sports contracts may lawfully continue in Ohio. The new notices identify their own recipients; they do not resolve every company’s position.
The court decision behind Ohio’s renewed enforcement
On September 25, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit affirmed the denial of Kalshi’s request for a preliminary injunction in Ohio. It also vacated a preliminary injunction in the related Tennessee appeal and sent the cases back for further proceedings. The Ohio result followed the district court’s March 9 decision, covered in Dyutam’s reporting on Ohio’s earlier ruling against Kalshi.
The appeals court concluded that Kalshi had not shown its sports event contracts met the statutory definition of swaps, a category of financial contract central to its federal-law argument. It also concluded that, even assuming they were swaps, the Commodity Exchange Act did not expressly or implicitly displace the relevant state laws. The decision addressed preliminary-injunction appeals; the underlying cases continue in the district courts.
-
Initial Ohio notices
Ohio targets Kalshi, Robinhood and Crypto.com. Robinhood’s notice is dated March 31.
-
District court denies Kalshi relief
The Ohio federal district court denies Kalshi’s request for a preliminary injunction.
-
Sixth Circuit affirms Ohio denial
The appeals court affirms the denial of relief in Ohio and vacates the Tennessee injunction.
-
Ten notices demand immediate cessation
The OCCC demands an immediate stop to offering or facilitating sports event contracts in Ohio.
-
Future deadlineWritten compliance confirmation due
Recipients must notify the commission that they have complied. This is a reporting deadline, not a grace period for continued sports trading.
The October 16 milestone records the notices’ deadline; it does not establish that any recipient has complied.
Federal regulators take the opposite position
The Commodity Futures Trading Commission argued in a May 12 brief in Kalshi’s Sixth Circuit appeal that its exclusive jurisdiction prevents Ohio from applying state gambling laws to contracts traded on federally regulated exchanges. Dyutam’s June coverage examines the CFTC’s proposed sports prediction market rules. It is the federal regulator’s legal argument, not a ruling overriding the October letters.
Courts have also reached different results at the preliminary-injunction stage. The Third Circuit upheld protection for Kalshi against New Jersey enforcement on April 6, as explained in Dyutam’s coverage of Kalshi’s earlier Third Circuit victory. That decision does not reverse the Sixth Circuit’s Ohio ruling. The Ninth Circuit, by contrast, affirmed the dissolution of Kalshi’s Nevada preliminary injunction on August 28.
What remains unconfirmed for Ohio customers
The letters establish what the commission demanded. They do not establish when each recipient changed access, blocked new orders or sent instructions to customers. The source review for this article, completed October 5 UTC, did not verify company-specific responses to these notices covering existing positions, settlement, refunds or withdrawals.
Receipt of a notice therefore cannot be treated as proof of an operational shutdown.
FAQs
Which prediction market firms received Ohio’s notices?
The October 2 packet names recipients associated with Coinbase, Gemini, Moomoo, Novig, Plus500, Polymarket, Prophet X, Robinhood, Underdog and Webull. Some letters name multiple entities; the roster includes both exchanges and intermediaries.
Is October 16 the shutdown deadline?
The letters demand immediate cessation. October 16, 2026 is the deadline for written confirmation of compliance, calculated from the letters’ 14-day response requirement. It is not permission to keep offering sports contracts until then.
Do the Ohio letters cover every prediction market?
These notices target offering or facilitating sports event contracts to people located in Ohio. They do not announce a nationwide ban or direct recipients to stop every category of prediction market.
How do the notices treat Robinhood and Kalshi?
Robinhood’s letter reasserts a March 31, 2025 notice after enforcement had been held pending court proceedings. Kalshi is not a recipient in this October 2 packet. Its absence does not establish an exemption or prove that its Ohio sports contracts are authorized.
Has the federal versus state jurisdiction dispute been settled?
No nationwide resolution follows from these notices. The Sixth Circuit upheld denial of preliminary protection for Kalshi in Ohio, while the Third Circuit upheld preliminary protection in New Jersey and the Ninth Circuit affirmed the dissolution of Kalshi’s Nevada injunction. The CFTC has argued that federal jurisdiction is exclusive.
KEY TAKEAWAYS
- Immediate cessation is the demand — the commission’s October 16 deadline concerns written confirmation of compliance.
- The ten letters cover more than exchanges — they also reach firms facilitating sports contracts, with Robinhood receiving a renewed notice.
- Enforcement and customer access are separate facts — the letters do not verify each firm’s operational response or settle the national jurisdiction dispute.
Sources
- October 2, 2026 combined cease-and-desist letters — Ohio Casino Control Commission, document hosted by AVC Communications.
- September 25, 2026 opinion in the Ohio and Tennessee Kalshi appeals — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.
- May 12, 2026 amicus brief in Kalshi’s Ohio appeal — Commodity Futures Trading Commission.
- April 6, 2026 Kalshi v. Flaherty opinion — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.
- April 16, 2025 commission meeting minutes — Ohio Casino Control Commission.
- March 31, 2025 reporting on Ohio’s initial notices — Hannah News Service.



